Myths about green index investing
Investing does not always have to be in companies that spend the money incorrectly, for example on weapons or other matters that have negative consequences for people and the environment. There are also a large number of sustainable indices in which you can invest. It is predicted that sustainable investment via passive index funds will grow within a few years. Not everyone agrees with this. A number of active managers claim that it is not possible to combine sustainable with passive. There is a lot to be said about the arguments they have for this. In this article you can read more about green investing in an index.
Myth 1: Sustainable indexes are a ‘black box’,
For example, it is said that sustainable indexes are part of a black box. As an investor, you would not know what you are buying if you buy a sustainable index fund. This is not always the case. Often you can easily look up what you are investing in. Of course, it is not the case that managers will always tell you what they have done in detail to achieve their outperformance. Sometimes it remains guesswork about all the sustainable considerations that came into play when putting together the portfolio. In addition, generalizing between the different indexes is not realistic, because one index is not the same as the other.
The approach to the composition within an index is also not always the same. To give an example, we can look at the funds of ESG and Northern Trust. These two funds use almost the same approach. Then you have iShares, for example. These funds are mainly concerned with water, alternative energy and sustainable indices. The holdings of these funds can simply be found daily on the website of the provider. So there is no black box at all, because investors simply have a good insight into the status of the funds.
Myth 2: Sustainability scores are ‘inconsistent’ (and that’s bad)
In addition, it is said that sustainability scores are inconsistent. The companies Systainalytics and MSCI assess the sustainability of companies. The importance of these sustainability scores can increase and this in turn has an influence on the creation of a sustainable index. The judgments that result from this are increasingly being questioned. For example, it is indicated that these parties sometimes differ in opinion. The term inconsistent is used for this.
The agencies do not all think the same about the sustainability level of companies such as Apple. This is somewhat comparable to the analyses that credit rating agencies and financial analysts do. In this case, opinions do not always point in the same direction. They all look at the same company, but opinions can differ. This has the advantage that it can create a financial market in the first place. This would never have been possible if everyone had shared the same opinion. A difference of opinion is not necessarily inconsistent.

Myth 3: Active managers are ‘more active’ than passive managers
Finally, it is said that active managers are more active than passive managers. Active ownership can be thought of as, for example, having votes during shareholder meetings or entering into dialogues with the companies in which one invests. The active managers, i.e. the managers who do participate in this, claim that they make much more and better efforts than their passive colleagues. By making these kinds of statements, a dividing line is created between passive and active managers. In practice, this dividing line does not appear to be so sharp. Many fund houses manage both passive and active strategies. When it comes to casting votes or entering into dialogues with the companies, all interests are often lumped together and the funds act in the same way.
In summary, it can be said that sustainable indices and therefore investing in a green index do not exist. There are many sustainable index strategies and therefore also many ways of applying transparency or the way in which it is all filled in. Both funds, both the passive sustainable and the active sustainable, are filled in on the basis of opinions. It is not possible to attach one truth to this. There is no truth to attach to the sustainability of a company, because there will always be many opinions about this. In addition, a strict separation between active and passion managers is also nonsense. This dividing line often does not exist in practice, and this also applies to the differences between active and passive investment funds . In practice, it works differently in both areas than theory would have us believe.
Compare brokers and start index investing
Are you excited about index investing after reading this article about ‘green index investing’? Compare brokers with index investing and find the broker that suits you best!